Executive Summary of Report of the Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor on Proposal to Establish an Independent Legal Aid Authority
There are two main government-funded bodies providing legal aid services in Hong Kong. The Duty Lawyer Scheme's primary role is to provide legal representation to defendants in the Magistrate's court. Although operated by the legal profession, there are t wo ways in which the Executive's control over DLS funding seriously compromises DLS' independence. First, the Executive's tight funding controls result in DLS lawyers being assigned a large case load, resulting in DLS lawyers having little time in which t o prepare each of their clients' cases. Second, the Executive generally only funds DLS representation of defendants accused of crimes on a schedule of offences which is first approved by the Executive. This schedule excludes many Immigration Ordinance off ences, in respect of which convicted persons are routinely given a prison sentence.
The Legal Aid Department funds representation of low-middle income persons in the higher courts. As a Government Department, the LAD is subject to a variety of institutional controls by the Executive over its policies and operation. Moreover, the LAD has been subject to informal Executive control over its policies and decisions, particularly in cases where Government decisions or actions are being challenged. Examples of the LAD's lack of independence from the Executive are given in the full report.
The Monitor expresses its deep concern over the lack of independence from the Executive of both the DLS and the LAD. In respect of the DLS, the Monitor recommends that it be the Legislature, not the non-elected Executive, which controls DLS funding. The p resent situation of not funding legal representation to defendants charged with immigration offences arguably constitutes racial discrimination by the Hong Kong Government.
In respect of the LAD, the Monitor recommends that it be disestablished as a Government Department under the control of the Executive, and made a statutory authority under the control of a newly established independent Legal Aid Authority. The Legislature , rather than the Executive, would appoint the LAA and oversee its funding. The Monitor also recommends that the disparity in Government funding of legal representation for the prosecution, and LAD legal representation for the defendant, cease. The presen t system results in unequal battles in the courts of justice, where the prosecution often has access to greater resources than does the defence.
The Monitor also recommends that the Official Solicitors Office be made independent of the LAD or the proposed LAA.
16 July 1998
Download the paper